Inbox Spam, Bathwater Gimmicks, and Underperforming Pits: My Time with Dr. Squatch
A Marketing Accountability Council Case Study in Attention Burnout and Strategic Drift
When a brand claims to be for “everyday guys” but acts like a Vegas stage show, you start to question who it’s really serving.
Dr. Squatch promised better ingredients, better performance, and better vibes. The soap smelled great. The cologne was surprisingly solid. But the $14 natural deodorant? Not so much. It underperformed on protection, required reapplication, and left me feeling more like I’d bought into a gimmick than upgraded my routine.
Still, I stuck with it until the marketing experience became more overwhelming than the product was useful.
And now that Unilever is acquiring Dr. Squatch, it's time we talk honestly about what they're inheriting and what needs to change.
What Went Wrong: A Breakdown in Marketing Integrity
Using MAC’s four-point lens, here’s what Dr. Squatch consistently got wrong—and what Unilever now risks amplifying:
1. Loss of Trust Through Overstated Product Promises
The claim: high-performance, natural deodorant built for real men.
The reality: spotty odor protection, frequent reapplication, and a price tag ($14) that felt unjustified.
MAC Principle: Promote realistic, transparent promises
Squatch didn’t just sell soap—they sold identity transformation. The problem? When the product doesn’t match the performance hype, customers feel duped, not delighted.
👉 Strategic misstep: The brand prioritized narrative over substance. That might generate clicks, but it erodes repeat purchase.
2. Aggressive Email and Text Tactics = Intermittent Reinforcement Hell
Let’s talk inbox. In just a month, I received:
"This happens TOMORROW!"
"Sydney Sweeney’s bathwater is back!"
"Iron Mike is now Moisture Mike!"
"Open now to reveal our newest scent!"
"SpongeBob is back—and he brought Patrick!"
And that’s just the subject lines.
I also got text messages often late at night promoting "secret drops" and “early access” sales that were anything but limited.
MAC Principle: Discourage addictive loops and manipulative reinforcement
This isn’t thoughtful marketing. It’s engineered volatility. Classic Skinner-box stuff: random timing, hyperbolic language, emotional baiting.
👉 Strategic misstep: Treating customers like attention sources, not relationships. The result? Churn. Unsubscribes. Erosion of brand equity.
3. Novelty Overload That Dilutes Distinctiveness
In 6 weeks, the brand launched:
Godzilla- and King Kong–themed soaps
A SpongeBob and Patrick collab
Call of Duty crossover
Sydney Sweeney’s bathwater soap (yes, again)
MAC Principle: Keep brand consistent and focus on long-term value. None of these stunts actually built trust; they only created buzz and then disappeared. It’s like marketing whiplash. When everything becomes a “moment,” there’s no clear brand identity anymore, just noise.
👉 Strategic misstep: Using cultural moments as fuel without anchoring them to consistent positioning. That’s not brand building—it’s trend-chasing.
4. From Community to Performance Funnel
When I first signed up, the Squatch brand felt personal. DTC. Independent. Gritty in a good way.
Then the tone changed.
Every message became a sales script. Urgency amped up. Emojis. All-caps. Time-limited discounts. Fake exclusivity. “Surprise reveals.”
MAC Principle: Respect attention and customer autonomy
It went from “a brand I liked” to “a tab I kept closing.” Marketing became the product, and the product took a backseat.
👉 Strategic misstep: Turning loyal customers into targets instead of community members. This creates performance fatigue, not emotional connection.
🔍 What Unilever Is Really Buying
Unilever states that the acquisition is part of a plan to enhance Gen Z engagement through influencer and social-first brands. But they’re not just acquiring a product portfolio, they’re acquiring:
A marketing playbook built on urgency, not utility
A customer base that’s already showing signs of fatigue
A brand drifting further from its original promise
This isn’t just a growth opportunity; it’s a brand rehabilitation project. Unilever must ask: Do we amplify this attention-seeking model, or fix the trust deficit at the core?
What Should Happen Next
If Unilever wants Dr. Squatch to survive the transition and grow sustainably they need to:
Fix the core product issues (starting with the deodorant). If you're going to charge a premium, you have to perform a premium.
Scale back the marketing firehose. Respect the inbox. Be more selective, not more frequent.
Ground campaigns in purpose, not stunts. Humor is great—until it overshadows the product itself.
Invest in retention, not just reach. Customers don’t churn because of ads—they churn because the brand stopped delivering value.
Final Thought: From a Burned-Out Customer
I didn’t unsubscribe because of the jokes. I unsubscribed because it stopped feeling like a relationship. The product didn’t hold up, the messaging overwhelmed me, and the brand forgot what made it great in the first place.
Now Unilever has a choice:
Double down on performance marketing theatrics.
Or rebuild trust with actual substance.
One path might get them some clicks.
The other could give them a brand that lasts.
Want more honest analysis like this? Subscribe to the Marketing Accountability Council. We call it like it is—because your inbox deserves better.
Great rundown Jay